Hi,
Since, as you note, there are sites which actually do rely on this, are you in
fact meaning to say that the option would exist, but not be mentioned in the
usage? I guess I'd also like to hear from Steven on pthreaded-ubik. It
appears that it actually isn't 100% stable, but is close, and apparently it's
issue(s) are difficult to provoke.
What we have in the code base definitely has bugs; Are there fixes
which have not made it back upstream?
Not significant fixes, no, but there are some minor ones.
At the moment, I know of no one interested in running pthreaded ubik,
Really ? Then you haven't been paying attention ;)
so there's a bit of chicken and egg -- i.e., I know what fixes need to
be done, but need some people willing to run it and give a green light
on it (or to kick me and tell me it's still broken). And I'd need to
carve out some time to work on it.
AFAIK the major bug (the VL DB server handing clients incorrect
file-servers addresses causing them to lose access to volumes) hasn't
been resolved ?
ali
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
