To leave it "as is" seems broken. So either change the name in the
'vos status' output or the calculation of the field. The question is
which one is less troublesome. I don't think this should be solved
by the "but we documented it over there" solution.

Harald.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel

Reply via email to