On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Harald Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > To leave it "as is" seems broken. So either change the name in the > 'vos status' output or the calculation of the field. The question is > which one is less troublesome. I don't think this should be solved > by the "but we documented it over there" solution.
Who knows what parses vos status output that we'd break, though. -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
