>Message: 5 >Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:28:02 -0400 >From: Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> >Organization: Secure Endpoints Inc. >To: [email protected] >Reply-To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] hudson success (i.e. automatically building)
>(3) Determine whether or not distributed builds can be supported. Hudson is very nice product, but on distribution/test I think builbot is better. (I use hudson anyway). Hudson can send the command for build only 2/3 ways with a push mode only (the slaves can't pull the master), all that could be a big limitation. For more details in build distribution : http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Distributed+builds On the other hand one of the advantages of Hudson is the huge number of plugins, in special way the Build reports, where you can find unit test, code analyzer and much more ... for more info: http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Plugins bye manfred _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
