On 13 Jul 2010, at 14:28, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > > There are several things that I believe should be done: > > (1) setup an account that is not your personal account for the execution > of your Hudson instance. This would be for two reasons: > > (a) distinguish what you have personally done from the automated > server. > > (b) permit all of the e-mail messages generated as a result of > testing to be filtered.
This should be done through gerrit's support for role accounts. I can either create them manually, or this could wait until we upgrade to the latest gerrit version when they can be created automatically (this would be preferred) > (2) figure out someway of logging the configuration that is being tested > (configure script output?) and submitting it with the verified > action. This is critical for determining what platforms and > configurations have been tested. It will be even more important > when reported failures to Gerrit or openafs-bugs. We should also upload a known broken change to gerrit and check that Hudson correctly identifies it. At the moment, it's sprinkling 'verified' over every commit it sees, and we don't actually know whether it's telling the truth or not. S. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
