On 07/13/2010 02:04 PM, Marcus Watts wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:01:51 CDT
To: [email protected]
From: Andrew Deason<[email protected]>
Subject: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: hudson success (i.e. automatically building)
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:33:45 -0400
Marcus Watts<[email protected]> wrote:
Other variations:
heimdal vs. MIT. (vs. neither).
--enable-demand-attach
--enable-disconnected
etc.
Keep in mind many configure options are going to be going away soon.
That doesn't mean you shouldn't do this for now if you want... but you
don't want to be running a build with --enable-demand-attach _and_ one
without it in the next week or two, since you'll be doing twice the work
you need to.
--
Andrew Deason
[email protected]
I was assuming Jason Edgecombe had already seen that discussion.
Obviously the list of supported configuration options will differ
between versions. I doubt that list will ever be empty.
It would be nice to get the list of options from configure, then march
through the list trying each one by one. That may be way too complicated,
especially with options that 'need something' to actually work.
And this may not fit in well with the way hudson (or buildbot) see
the world.
Another thing to try, "make install" vs. "make dest" -- and whether the
same set of things gets installed between the two. In the same vein,
"--enable-transarc-paths". Perhaps some of this messiness will disappear
when configuration options are simplified.
Thanks to Marcus and everyone for their suggestions. Unfortunately, I'm
still trying to get this thing crawling before walking or running. I
think having a correct builder that fails or succeeds when appropriate
is the first priority. Working with approved gerrit submitters is the
next priority.
Jason
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
