On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:52:00 -0400 Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this is a good model. We could perhaps start without the > automatic +1 SAFE, in case "trusted" developers want to submit changes > that are not necessarily ready for test builds (for example, a build > system change on which they want further review before deciding it is > "safe"). We could default to an auto +1 safe for 'trusted' devs, but allow you to specify that a commit is _not_ to be 'safe'. Perhaps by adding some string to the commit message. "Buildbot-safe: no"? And '+1 looks good to me' on the model in general. -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
