On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:58:22 +0200 Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2) if created locally they would cover a later file of the same name > if one is created how about a new 'file type' that is 'special' just like mounts. however, they would only have a local (to the client host) meaning. old clients would see 'files' (with a strange prefix i guess) and new clients would be able to handle these things as special devices (named pipes and the like). not storing these files on the server seems like a non-starter. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
