On Sep 16, 2010, at 1:53 PM, chas williams - CONTRACTOR <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:58:22 +0200 > Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> 2) if created locally they would cover a later file of the same name >> if one is created > > how about a new 'file type' that is 'special' just like mounts. > however, they would only have a local (to the client host) > meaning. old clients would see 'files' (with a strange prefix i > guess) and new clients would be able to handle these things as special > devices (named pipes and the like). > > not storing these files on the server seems like a non starter writes-while-disconnected are already not stored on the server. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
