On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Marc Dionne wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Simon Wilkinson >> <simonxwilkin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I don't have time to investigate a fix for this, but it's caused by >>>> having two distinct declarations for the same uninitialized data >>>> object, which FreeBSD does not allow in kernel code. If someone else >>>> can propose a fix, poke me through Gerrit and I'll review. >>> >>> >>> With eca07c108cc61fc9a6da720848e1beb78833f670, neither >>> rx_incomingCallQueue or rx_idleServerQueue are defined in rx_globals.h. In >>> fact, the only reference to rx_incomingCallQueue in the tree is in rx.c. >>> >>> I'm somewhat puzzled by this build failure, unless the FreeBSD builder >>> isn't cleaning its tree properly between builds? >> >> >> That would be my guess. Looking at the buildbot log, neither rx.o or >> rx_globals.o are rebuilt during the failed build. So we probably have >> an rx_globals.o that dates from before that change, while rx.o was >> rebuilt after the change. > > > Hmm, I thought that the builders were supposed to 'git clean -xfd' before > each build?
At least this one is currently doing: git clean -X -f -e '!.buildbot-sourcedata' which doesn't have -d and doesn't remove the libafs/MODLOAD directory and its object files. Marc _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
