if no one beats me to it I will look at the build slave config on the master when I get to my gate
Derrick On Oct 26, 2012, at 12:04, Marc Dionne <marc.c.dio...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Marc Dionne wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Simon Wilkinson >>> <simonxwilkin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I don't have time to investigate a fix for this, but it's caused by >>>>> having two distinct declarations for the same uninitialized data >>>>> object, which FreeBSD does not allow in kernel code. If someone else >>>>> can propose a fix, poke me through Gerrit and I'll review. >>>> >>>> >>>> With eca07c108cc61fc9a6da720848e1beb78833f670, neither >>>> rx_incomingCallQueue or rx_idleServerQueue are defined in rx_globals.h. In >>>> fact, the only reference to rx_incomingCallQueue in the tree is in rx.c. >>>> >>>> I'm somewhat puzzled by this build failure, unless the FreeBSD builder >>>> isn't cleaning its tree properly between builds? >>> >>> >>> That would be my guess. Looking at the buildbot log, neither rx.o or >>> rx_globals.o are rebuilt during the failed build. So we probably have >>> an rx_globals.o that dates from before that change, while rx.o was >>> rebuilt after the change. >> >> >> Hmm, I thought that the builders were supposed to 'git clean -xfd' before >> each build? > > At least this one is currently doing: > git clean -X -f -e '!.buildbot-sourcedata' > > which doesn't have -d and doesn't remove the libafs/MODLOAD directory > and its object files. > > Marc > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-devel mailing list > OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel > _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-devel mailing list OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
