Thanks. A patch is in the works to make this issue go away for future releases, so that the dependencies on the kernel can be generated automatically instead of manually. This patch should get into the build system relatively soon.
-derek "Steven N. Hirsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 1 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > alternatively if one wants to (1) preserve the existing style (2) > > continue to work on previous 2.4.x platforms, it is simple to mimic > > other struct inode element patches as follows (off of 1.2.1, doesn't > > appear to be in CVS yet.) > > > > diff -uwrp modules/openafs/src/afs/LINUX/osi_vfs.h >../modules/openafs/src/afs/LINUX/osi_vfs.h > > --- modules/openafs/src/afs/LINUX/osi_vfs.h Tue Sep 11 10:25:07 2001 > > +++ ../modules/openafs/src/afs/LINUX/osi_vfs.h Mon Oct 1 11:20:20 2001 > > (snip) > > Err, yes. If one understands the build system (i.e. automake, autoconf, > libtool), then you are correct. Despite many attempts, it remains a > largely-undocumented mystery to me. > > I just wanted to bring the struct inode changes to others attention, since > I saw no discussion on the list. > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
