On Aug 13, 2004, at 1:32 PM, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Aug 13, 2004, at 12:32 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Have you (or anyone else) compiled all of OpenAFS on a system with this patch? If AFS was using any of the changed fields, it should get a compile error.
Yes, there are a few ifdef blocks in src/vfsck/setup.c which reference fs_interleave. This did of course produce compile errors. I'm going to try re-working the code a bit to account for fs_si and see what happens.
Ok, it seems fs_si is a member that provides status for Solaris Live Update (lufs) and from the looks of it, can largely be ignored. fs_interleave is some hold-over from BSD 4.3 days and I guess Sun is using these old rotational positioning parameters as placeholders for modern stuff.
/dale
_______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
