On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Lester Barrows wrote:
I can only go into so much detail about our configuration for various reasons, but I'd be happy to do what I can in the future. My statement that the developers are not interested in a solution for the NAT issue however comes from the recurring anti-NAT response seen several times in the past on this list when these issues have come up. I won't argue the point any further, however the particular statement you pulled out was intended to be taken in context of the statement which directly followed.
NAT sucks. I'd like to solve the NAT problem by taking it out back and shooting it. But failing that I'd like a solution which is usable today.
Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
