On Monday, January 09, 2006 09:45:46 AM +0100 Rainer Toebbicke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
Getting a directory format that would be backward compatible with
existing clients was a tricky bit of work, but I think we succeeded.
At what state? Source code or "design document"?
There is a design, on the hackathon web site at http://afsig.se/
I don't recall if anyone has begun implementation work; most of us have
been rather busy with other things.
Support for directories with > 64k-odd entries?
Yes
Support for directory
entries pointing to files in located in *other* volumes (and with what
type of ACL semantics)?
Huh? Why would we do that?
Directory entries describe files within a single directory.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info