Adam Megacz wrote:
> I argue that, in the post-Transarc era, there are a large number of
> situations where OpenAFS is useful for which no coherent/meaningful
> definition of "site" exists ("cell", of course, is still well-defined).For 99% of users, they install OpenAFS to access the data in one cell. The reason that NetIdMgr supports the ability to obtain tokens for multiple cells from one Kerberos principal is due to the fact that a small number of power users such as myself need that functionality. However, today the vast majority of your users are only obtaining data from a single location. Your "cell" is a "site". It has its own authentication service and provides its own name space. Jeffrey Altman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
