Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >>> In this particular case (asetkey), since the interesting thing is to >>> get ACFG errors out, and it's all on the AFS side of things, getting >>> the right thing to happen is doable. >> >> Sure, _this_ time you want the AFS errors ... what happens next time >> when you want the Kerberos error out? > > Use the other binary.
This probably isn't good in the general case, but can't asetkey simply exec translate_et itself when an AFS error is encountered? Or is that a really bad idea? <<CDC _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
