>> This probably isn't good in the general case, but can't asetkey simply >> exec translate_et itself when an AFS error is encountered? Or is that a >> really bad idea? > >Ask Ken what I think of the exec method.
Translation: Derrick will piss and moan about it for a few years, but eventually stop ... or you will learn to ignore it, I can't really tell the difference anymore :-) I am not particularly in love with the idea of exec'ing translate_et just to translate errors for asetkey ... the people who run that SHOULD be able to just run translate_et for themselves (although somehow that doesn't seem to be the case). If we can provide a useful error we should try (or at least issue a message saying "run translate_et to determine the error"). That would argue toward linking against the Kerberos com_err library, though. --Ken _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
