On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Marcus Watts wrote:
Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: openafs-info <[email protected]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OpenAFS] com_err hell (WAS: asetkey: failed to set key, code 70354694)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:13:58 -0700
Re: the whole com_err mess...
If AFS has an incompatible implementation, why not just rename the
exported functions / vars and get it over with? This should be no more
than a day's work, and would solve the problem very nicely. Or am I
missing something?
From an application standpoint that would be a very
disappointing answer - it means you can't really have
one error number space anymore.
Well, for the moment you can't anyway, really. We need to find a way to
unify with Heimdal, ext2 and MIT Krb5 but until we do we can at least make
it possible to not lose.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
