On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Adam Megacz wrote:
Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
the problem is it lives in the volume group of its parent, so it's a
halfling. parent's gone, but... yeah, like you say
While we're on the topic, what is the reason for having volume groups
in the first place rather than just having a reference in the volume
header saying "I am a backup volume for volume XYZ" to establish
volume relationships?
i don't remember. it can probably be addressed but it won't fix the namei
tag issue
Is the "volume numbers share all but the last three bits" criterion
visible to the cache manager, or is this something that could be
altered just on the servers and admin clients (vos, bos, etc)?
cm doesn't care. it's internal
- a
--
PGP/GPG: 5C9F F366 C9CF 2145 E770 B1B8 EFB1 462D A146 C380
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
