"Derrick Brashear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > it would involve a semantic change but we could start flushing changes in > the background before fsync. there are of course potential issues.
Wouldn't it be the same semantics as if the client cache were rather small? I can get the app to fsync(), though, so it looks like I'll go with that. - a _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
