On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Adam Megacz wrote:
"Derrick Brashear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
it would involve a semantic change but we could start flushing changes in
the background before fsync. there are of course potential issues.
Wouldn't it be the same semantics as if the client cache were rather small?
largely. but this forces the change for everyone.
I can get the app to fsync(), though, so it looks like I'll go with that.
good.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
