i disagree about distribution. i do think we should have a page with instructions and resources we provide a reference to.
On 10/25/07, Jeff Blaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMO, it should be distributed with it and referenced > in a new README.kaserver (which also should include > the elders EOL statement regarding kaserver). > > It doesn't have to be referenced by the build process. > > I wouldn't surprise me to find that nobody agrees with > me again. > > Jeffrey Altman wrote: > > Derrick Brashear wrote: > >> > >> On 10/25/07, *Jeff Blaine* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > >> > >> You had me wondering. > >> > >> The only reference to afs2k5db I could find in source was > >> > >> src/packaging/RedHat/openafs.spec.in > >> > >> Which then leads me to: > >> > >> Are the RedHat builds getting preferential treatment with > >> regard to this? Is there a reason? What's up? > >> > >> > >> in the sense that warlord made the rpms ship the entire afs-krb5 kit, > >> and no other set of packages does, yes. > >> technically that wasn't part of openafs. i think it's in 1.4.5 now > though. > > > > afs2k5db is not part of openafs 1.4.5. Building it requires access to > > private MIT krb5 headers. We would distribute it if we could build it > > using the public headers but we can't. > > > > Jeffrey Altman > > > > >
