Ken Hornstein wrote: > I agree with you that logically afs2k5db should probably live in > MIT Kerberos ... but good luck in fighting THAT windmill :-/ The > reason I suggested fixing afs2k5db up and putting it in OpenAFS was > that it didn't require Hell to freeze over to make it happen :-)
Trust me. I am well aware of it. Still if someone did the work and presented it to them, now that they are a Consortium it might be possible to make a business case to them instead of a technical one. This is one battle I am going to stay away from.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
