I've been building RPMS for openafs versions for years and have always just used the default approach that creates openafs-kernel rpm.
Now I notice in the 1.4.6 spec file an option for fedora, but I can't quite understand what benefit there is in this approach. The only thing I can tell for sure is it builds the kernel module into a package called kmod-openafs. I don't understand what the benefit of that change is. Can you fill me in? -- Paul E. Johnson Professor, Political Science 1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504 University of Kansas _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
