On Feb 12, 2008 4:58 PM, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been building RPMS for openafs versions for years and have always > just used the default approach that creates openafs-kernel rpm. > > Now I notice in the 1.4.6 spec file an option for fedora, but I can't > quite understand what benefit there is in this approach. The only > thing I can tell for sure is it builds the kernel module into a > package called kmod-openafs. I don't understand what the benefit of > that change is. > > Can you fill me in?
Other packages for fedora which provide kernel modules do the same with same-style dependencies; we provide something analogous to what everyone else(*) does. Derrick * except people who believe, perhaps rightly, that kmod is flawed and kmdl is the answer; they aren't necessarily wrong but "hey install this other package of macros everywhere" wasn't really my cup of tea either. i can't say i love any of the answers. 1.4.7 will also include dkms support. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
