On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Derrick Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OpenAFS has started down a path to formally organizing. One piece of > the plan involves formalizing roles, and so provided here is a draft > plan for the role of the gatekeepers as well as expectations of > contributors in their interactions. Comments welcome, either privately > or ideally to [email protected] . > > http://www.openafs.org/foundation/gatekeepers.html >
Looks good. A note: # must for major architectural changes engage the community for guidance and the Advisory Board for a final decision on acceptance. A review of the proposed changes must be provided to the community and Advisory Board by the Gatekeepers. (Standards-based changes must go through the protocol standards process rather than an internal process) Better is: For major architectural changes, must engage..... I would also add functional tests in addition to unit tests. Many functional tests already exist (in src/tests), so improving that should be encouraged. -- Steven Jenkins End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
