> ... Comments welcome, either privately > or ideally to [email protected] . > > http://www.openafs.org/foundation/gatekeepers.html
I note that item 3 of the gatekeeper responsibilities could negate the necessity of including the contributor responsibilities (since item 3 indicates the gatekeepers will develop/publish the standards for contributions). I guess I would prefer that the contributors responsibilities section be eliminated, and instead that content become a potential draft that the gatekeepers can choose to use to meet their requirements to publish contribution standards (and could be used until a further revision is available). If one wants to be paranoid, one might also consider that a gatekeeper should not approve their own contribution. However, that might be a commit too far. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
