-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 This assessment seems pretty sound. It's still the case that some contributors have preferred to contribute under BSD terms, and might continue to do so. Do we have a mechanism in place to know under what terms a specific non-founding contribution has been made?
Derrick Brashear wrote: >> > While I personally would like to see it easier to relicense the > codebase to BSD, I believe this is not realistic as it would > require all contributors to agree or have their contributions > discarded and reimplemented... and more importantly I don't think > there's much danger of IBM's lawyers vetting and agreeing to it. - -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIwVk+JiSUUSaRdSURCDjYAKCNJ6dTVWukXwnNVPNEoVmUA+TDAQCfd83k DUS+S4dKhaKMeW6Dtf8IqKc= =RAwT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
