"Buhrmaster, Gary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would a more lightweight process be acceptable, in > that any code needs to be accompanied by the > equivalent of the Linux "Developers Certificate > of Origin" signoff (by the developer)? > > That puts the onerous on the submitters to insure > that their submissions meets their (and/or their > employers) requirements.
I think that's the sort of agreement that Derrick has in mind (as opposed to the FSF-style copyright assignment, which however nice in the abstract would be a major pain and isn't really tenable). Personally, I'd rather sign it once rather than providing a new copy with each code submission, since I can readily agree to something like that. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
