On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:52:26 +0100 (CET) Harald Barth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Probably not an argument against changing the default (only happens > > on the largest cells with very long dbserver uptimes), > > "large" here means "many DB changes" I suppose? Yeah, sorry. I'm only aware of two instances of it happening, and they were very large cells. One of them Russ should recall: http://www.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2004-April/013238.html > So how should we detect a ubik ID rollover instead? I don't know; is it just if the trans id is negative? -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
