On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Mattias Pantzare <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 18:15, Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Mattias Pantzare <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Is it not time to remove the default CellServDB? Or at least remove >>> not working entries? >>> >>> Some programs try to be user friendly by doing the equivalent of echo >>> */* in /afs. That will take a _very_ long time (if it ever finishes) >>> with the default CellServDB. >> >> -fakestat-all is your friend, but really, */*? what program? > > I have -fakestatt-all. That does not help.
if you spell it like that, probably not. but it won't help for ls /afs/*/*, only for ls -l /afs > > Intellij IDEA, it tries to be friendly by only listing directories > that contains things that may be of interest. what's "of interest"? >> >>> And it is not very user friendly to list a bunch of directories that don't >>> work. >> >> So you're never behind a firewall? What works is relative. And what >> works for you is relative. Choose what you wish and use that. > > Huh? I am often behind a firewall. Right. Does it pass all AFS traffic? Some? None? Do all which you are behind act the same? > I am _not_ talking about removing CellServeDB, I am talking about > removing the _default_ CellServeDB. Then you've removed CellServDB. >You can still add your DB servers > to your own CellServeDB. > > The current CellServeDB in the distribution is simply not user > friendly. If I find users who disagree to comment to that extent here, then what? > The only sites that may benefit from it are those that are > in it. It is of no use for new sites. They can be listed, so... I don't follow. Also, no one at a new site ever cares about using an extant cell? -- Derrick _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
