On 12/2/2010 10:45 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Of course that requires that there be a log rotation tool.  I don't
>> think that OpenAFS by default should fill the disk partition simply
>> because it is permitted to run for years without restarts and the admin
>> has not configured a log rotation tool.
> 
> This is the main reason why I think syslog logging should be the default
> for new installations somehow.  I do realize that there are bad syslogds
> in some places, and if one wants full audit logging and debugging some
> syslogds can't cope.  And I don't want to force syslog on people who
> really don't want it, nor do I really want to change behavior on upgrades
> very badly.
> 
> But every UNIX system has syslog out of the box, and every other major
> open source server application that I can think of other than Apache and
> Java applications uses syslog by default, precisely because it's already
> set up to do something sane, rotate logs, etc.  That's been the case for
> decades.  AFS has always been exceptionally weird in that it does its own
> (somewhat annoying) logging rather than using the facility everyone else
> uses.
> 
> And we just don't log that much stuff by default.  If you're turning on
> huge amounts of logging, you may want to switch to something special, but
> for the amount of stuff we log by default, syslog would be perfectly fine
> and would probably make it much easier for server administrators to find
> the logs (since they'd be in the same place they look for logs for
> everything else they run).

My one concern to switching to something like syslog by default is that
"bos getlog" will need to be re-implemented in a different fashion.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to