On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:33:07 -0500 Derrick Brashear <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> writes: > > > >> My one concern to switching to something like syslog by default is > >> that "bos getlog" will need to be re-implemented in a different > >> fashion. > > > > Yeah, this is a very good point. I think I've used bos getlog > > maybe three times in the past fifteen years, so I never think about > > it, but I suspect others use it more than I do. > > bos salvage -showlog? i think salvager output is one of those things that we might want to handle with special cases. if the salvager is run from the fileserver i would expect the output to go to the syslog (if the fileserver is logging to syslog). if i run the salvager manually via bos, and bos is logging to syslog, i would expect to see the salvager output but not get it logged. similar to the way fsck behaves on a system. only the automated runs are logged. ordinary runs come to the command line. bos getlog should probably just be dropped. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
