On Dec 14, 2010, at 16:32 , Harald Barth wrote:

>> The version information per rxdebug is unreliable, of course. It's any
>> arbitrary build-time string.
> 
> Yes. I mess around it in my builds for this site, but I suspect that
> most people are sensible and restrict the messing around to appending
> subversions, like
> 
> $ rxdebug jack 7000 -v
> Trying 130.237.232.202 (port 7000):
> AFS version:  OpenAFS 1.4.12-pdc59 built  2010-04-07 


# rxdebug localhost 7001 -v
Trying 127.0.0.1 (port 7001):
AFS version:  OpenAFS 1.5.78 built 2010-12-14 ([email protected])

# rxdebug some_other_sites_db_server 7002 -v
Trying ... (port 7002):
AFS version:  OpenAFS 1.4.11 built  2010-03-25 4294967295 0

Most people even seem to leave the release token alone... but not all :-)

Adding information here seems to be rather common. Maybe some standardized way 
of doing it would be a useful feature?

- Stephan

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany

_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to