That was my thought too, but I'd hard-code a sunset on using the
technique. Pick a date beyond which we just skip the test so clients quit
doing it, and that wart can be removed from the source any time thereafter.

On 12/16/2010 11:51 AM, Steve Simmons sent:
> Having read the entire discussion up to this point, I find the alternate 
> version 3404 to be an acceptable workaround. There are lots of things in 
> various bits of software which look around for condition X to see if Y is 
> acceptable. Lacking a proper solution (more on that in a separate note), this 
> seems quite reliable. 
> 
> Derrick notes it's dicey software release and engineering; yeah, I agree. So 
> let's comment the crap out of it in the code.
> 
> Summary: go for it.
> 
> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

-- 
   +--------------------------------------------------------------+
  / [email protected]  919-445-9302  http://www.unc.edu/~utoddl /
 /        Those who jump off a Paris bridge are in Seine.       /
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to