[email protected] writes: > I believe fedora fusion has the openafs implementation. IIRC it is an > issue with the license incompatibility...
> You should be able to get it into the mainline fedora branch if you want > to be the package maintainer since there won't be a licensing issue. :) My understanding was that the problem with getting OpenAFS itself into the Fedora distribution is that they had a fairly strict policy against taking any out-of-tree modules. The IPL is only one of many reasons why OpenAFS itself could never be an in-tree Linux kernel module. Hopefully pam-afs-session won't have similar issues -- the license and whatnot for it should be familiar and comfortable. I just don't know if Fedora will take a package that's only useful if you have another, out-of-distro package installed. (Debian only sort of does; you can put such packages in contrib, but they're not officially part of the distribution.) -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
