On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:00 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> It maybe better to have it a part of fedora fusion which I believe has the
> openafs binaries as well as codecs, flash, etc which don't have the right
> license to be in fedora proper.

Yeah, this may have to end up in RPMFusion.

- Ken
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

Reply via email to