On Mar 17, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Harald Barth wrote:
Not sure why anyone would want to use anything other than Teradactyl.
1. $$
I keep hearing this - but quite frankly find Teradactyl quite
inexpensive.
I think much of this depends on the size of the cell.
2. Integration with existing system and tape robot lacking.
At the time we were running TSM and DMF against the same
tape robot and did not want a third system "fighting" for
tape drives.
I'm not sure this has anything to do with the use of Teradactyl but
instead the complexity of your backup environment. If you're using
TSM you'll find Teradactyl a real bargain ;-)
Rich
---
Another option is to use the software written by Anders Magnusson
<[email protected]> which does per file backups to TSM. We do only per
volume backups.
Harald.
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
