On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Thomas Smith wrote:
> Teradactyl is _very_ expensive, cost prohibitively so for many. (I
> recently looked at it as a potential replacement [for consolidation]
> for my current backup systems--BackupAFS and Zmanda.)
Seconded. At ${previousJob}, we contacted Teradactyl regarding TiBs and it
was outrageously expensive. ${previousBoss} said it amounted to "information
super-highway robbery." :-)
> I've been using BackupAFS for a few months now and it is working
> pretty well. The initial setup is a bit involved--but once it's up and
> running, it pretty much just works. Definitely worth a look.
Interesting. I'll be checking this out.
U.O.
