> Are you seeing the same performance issues with the 1.6 version of
'vos'?
I tried it and it was terribly unstable on debian squeeze,
> Can you confirm that commenting out the field and rebuilding
restores the slow transmission speed with the 1.4 vos?r>
no, I did it again but there is no improvement, so uncommenting the
maxPacketsize does not help, first, it want change the laignment cause it has
sizeof 8-bytes + it is not being referenced in the source tree. Probably that
vos release occured while wan connection was functioning at max bandwidth.
If the answer is 'yes' to the previous question, instead of removing
the comment from maxPacketSize, do you see a similar performance
benefit if you add a new field later in the structure? Perhaps
after 'refCount' or 'securityIndex'?
As Simon said, if there is a problem with how this structure is
being processed, we probably have a similar problem throughout the
code base. It is important for us to understand what the cause of
the problem is.
