>> * The FreeBSD platform, having ZFS, is IMNSHO an excellent choice for a >> file server. >> >> How far ahead is the client code on FreeBSD?
> It works under light load, but I am pretty sure there are subtle lingering > issues, and it should not be considered production-ready. Only memory cache > is available. Are your comments about "light load" related to ZFS or OpenAFS? We're got several heavy-usage FreeBSD servers running 8.2 or 9.0 that have ZFS file partitions and are humming along nicely, for what it's worth. I'm looking in to AFS because we need Kerberized file services, and all our client OSs support OpenAFS, whereas they do *not* all support Kerberized NFSv4. -- Tim Gustafson [email protected] 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
