On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) <[email protected]> wrote: .... > we are running lustre alongside afs right now. lustre is generally > much much faster than afs. the downside is that the security model > is essentially nfsv3. anyone with root on a lustre client is essentially > any other user on the filesystem and can read/write your files.
My recollection was that if you are willing/able to run bleeding edge that there was gssapi support in Lustre. I have no idea how production ready that support is. Regardless, Lustre is no AFS (and vice versa). Different strengths and different weaknesses. Gary _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
