How much would you pay per month to be listed on the 'donate' landing page as an OpenAFS supporter, and have access to nag-free binaries?
As a comparison, what is your college monthly spend on RHEL? How do we, as a community of developers, make a case to your management that the value provided by AFS is of the same order of magnitude as a RHEL subscription (**or** the staff time for maintaining CentOS), and make the same order of magnitude contribution to OpenAFS. I think in-kind donation of staff time and machines for testing new releases would be an excellent way to make non-monetary contributions. On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 07:36:55PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:33:07PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > src/aklog$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../lib ./aklog > > This software is free software, and depends on your ongoing support > > Please consider a donation to http://openafs.org/Donate > > src/tfs/src/aklog$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../lib ./aklog -nonag > > src/tfs/src/aklog$ > > I can tell you right now that I'd probably patch the source to remove > this in our environment. It would break so much stuff, and just > further prove to my management that AFS is on its way out, since now I > have to maintain local patches. > > -- > Jonathan Billings <[email protected]> > College of Engineering - CAEN - Unix and Linux Support > _______________________________________________ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
