On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:39:07 -0400 (EDT) "Matt W. Benjamin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just for clarification, and I don't know who to ask at this point, > this mail discusses "tcpoob." What happened to rxtcp? I don't know, but to be clear, this isn't intended to completely replace that. There are advantages to doing everything over TCP (which rxtcp would solve, and oob does not), and there are advantages to being able to push file payloads over an arbitrary protocol (which oob does, and rxtcp does not). -- Andrew Deason [email protected] _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
