On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:31:46 -0500 Andrew Deason <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's possible for a UDP-based protocol to behave very well, and in some > situations exceed TCP. I don't think Rx should be such a protocol, since > I think we should be focusing on making filesystems instead of > researching flow control. Er, not that current speed improvements are > unwelcome; it should be faster, but spending the time making it TCP-fast > just seems like wasting time reinventing TCP. quite a bit of work has been done in the area of making udp fast and reliable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UDP-based_Data_Transfer_Protocol there is no reason that some of these ideas could help afs' rx. _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
