It's not important, but I thought I'd run kadb_check on a current
kaserver.DB0 (yes, I'm planning to switch to K5 before I retire...) and
it complains about bad entries, and the -entries switch returns "funny
stuff".
I've run it on various Centos 6 systems, with openafs 1.6.1 to 1.6.11,
pulling the file kaserver.DB0 from various places. I generally compile
my own openafs, but I extracted a kadb_check binary from the release
1.6.11.1 rpm. Always the same.
I copied kaserver.DB0 to an old AIX system, and its kadb_check works fine.
https://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2010-April/033520.html
mentions "/2/ fix kadb_check to produce correct output. Should match on
little and big-endian machines."
Should I just forget about the whole thing and go home?
Thanks,
Steve
--
Stephen Roseman
Lehigh University
Library & Technology Services
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
