On Apr 7, 2016, at 19:03 , Jeffrey Altman wrote: > On 4/7/2016 3:08 AM, Andreas Ladanyi wrote: >> Short feedback: >> The workaround with afs_GenericStoreProc works for the first tests. >> Colleges told me that the workaround with afs_GenericStoreProc seems to >> result in slower read/write operations. > > > The performance of OpenAFS returning to the use of afs_GenericStoreProc > is equivalent to that of the 1.4.x release series. > > Slide 19 of > > http://conferences.inf.ed.ac.uk/eakc2012/slides/AFS_Performance.pdf > > will show you the difference in the performance curve. The blue line > will be equivalent to the performance of OpenAFS 1.6.17 on the Linux 4.3 > kernel and the green line will be the performance of the upcoming 1.6.18 > on the Linux 4.4 and later kernels. > > The AuriStorFS clients for Linux 4.4 through 4.6.rc1 do not suffer this > performance degradation.
Does Auristor provide Ubuntu LTS client packages? And what's the price tag? _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
