I have tried to use the switch -nosort but the resulting list is not
ordered in groups of volumes for same file servers while the backup dump
is indeed done server by server.
Anyhow I do agree that the best solution is to define different volsets
as suggested by Stephen and we will explore that solution!
Thanks everybody for the suggestions and have a good Sunday!
Giovanni
On 09/04/16 17:42, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
On 4/9/2016 8:41 AM, Giovanni Bracco wrote:
But vos listvldb provides a list of volumes alphabetically sorted by vol
name!
Even if it makes use of the same routine the output provided forgets
that, I think
Giovanni
Giovanni,
It is true that the output of "vos listvldb" is sorted as documented in
the man page
http://docs.openafs.org/Reference/1/vos_listvldb.html
"By default, volumes are sorted alphabetically by volume name. Including
the -nosort flag skips the sorting step, which can speed up the
production of output if there are a large number of entries."
When sorting is disabled the output order will exactly match the output
order of the VL_ListAttribuytesN2 RPC.
That being said, Stephen Joyce's suggestion of defining separate backup
sets by geographic location is the wayto go.
Jeffrey Altman
--
Giovanni Bracco
DTE-ICT-HPC
ENEA
Via E. Fermi 45
I-00044 Frascati (Roma) Italy
phone +39-06-9400-5597 mobile +39-3351992144
FAX +39-06-9400-5735
E-mail [email protected]
WWW http://www.afs.enea.it/bracco
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
