On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Andreas Hirczy wrote: > > I'd rather prefer not to increase -cb, since this seems to be not our > usual usage pattern.
Increasing -cb is pretty cheap; IIRC it's about 32 bytes of memory per callback, and the runtime overhead only comes into play at shutdown. My draft change to auto-tune fileserver parameters for a target memory footprint at https://gerrit.openafs.org/#/c/11629/ just uses all the remaining memory footprint after the other parameters are tuned for callbacks. The openafs servers are very bad at making full use of the hardware resources available; increasing callbacks is one way to make a more effective use of resources. -Ben P.S. if anyone wants to review and/or test that gerrit change, that would be great! _______________________________________________ OpenAFS-info mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
